Opinion PB Mehta writes: Why Agnipath is not the reform the armed forces need.National Herald case Rahul Gandhi quizzed by ED for 10 hours, summoned for 4th time on Friday.In a statement on Twitter, Musk has said that, “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated.” He added that he wants to make algorithms open source, increase platform trust and also defeat spam bots. I’m so happy Twitter will continue to serve the public conversation. This is the right path…I believe it with all my heart. Thank you both for getting the company out of an impossible situation. I trust his mission to extend the light of consciousness.Įlon’s goal of creating a platform that is “maximally trusted and broadly inclusive” is the right one. Solving for the problem of it being a company however, Elon is the singular solution I trust.
It wants to be a public good at a protocol level, not a company. In principle, I don’t believe anyone should own or run Twitter. Taking it back from Wall Street is the correct first step. It has been owned by Wall Street and the ad model. Twitter as a company has always been my sole issue and my biggest regret. The idea and service is all that matters to me, and I will do whatever it takes to protect both. Twitter is the closest thing we have to a global consciousness. This is the right path…I believe it with all my heart,” he wrote. “Thank you both for getting the company out of an impossible situation.
#ELON MUSK STEP TOWARDS THE STARS FREE#
The proposal, opposed by the board, was thrown into the spotlight after a Black former contract worker on Monday won a $137 million jury award against Tesla over workplace racism.Also read | Elon Musk’s Twitter: How his free speech argument could play out in India Shareholders also voted against a stockholder proposal asking for a study into the impact of Tesla's use of arbitration on workplace harassment and discrimination. Just changing the term is just an artifact of a larger governance issue," William Klepper, a professor at Columbia Business School, said.Īdvisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) had recommended that Tesla investors not re-elect the two directors because of concerns about excessive compensation packages to non-executive board members. "They've got a lot more work to do on governance. But I think they know the pressure is on them," Stephen Diamond, a professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, said. "It's unfortunate that the shareholders did not agree to remove Murdoch and Musk's brother. DIRECTOR TERM CUTĭespite some criticism from activist shareholders and a proxy advisory service, shareholders followed board guidance on several key proposals, including reelection of Kimball Musk, Elon's brother, and James Murdoch as board directors.īut they voted in favour of a stockholder proposal to reduce director terms from three years to one year and a proposal regarding additional reporting on diversity and inclusion efforts. The phrase is based on a venerable and popular Texas anti-littering campaign - Don't Mess with Texas. At the meeting he showed off a design of what looked like a cowboy-style belt buckle emblazoned with "Don't Mess With T" - the T in the style of the Tesla logo.
0 kommentar(er)
